Image of early Candlestick Phone

The Telecom Digest
Wednesday, November 2, 2022

Image of Modern Desktop Phone
Copyright © 2022 E. William Horne. All Rights Reserved.
Volume 41 Table of Contents Issue 242
T-Mobile will soon start charging $35 activation fees for (almost) every transaction
T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T find a surprise growth area in Q3
AT&T phone service frustration after loved one dies
T-Mobile will soon start charging $35 activation fees for (almost) every transaction
CALL TO ACTION! Seeking Additional Stakeholders Interested In Filing Joint Comments In FCC's RoboText Mitigation Rulemaking Proceeding; Must Act Fast!
Message-ID: <20221101134041.GA684613@telecomdigest.us> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 13:40:41 +0000 From: Bill Horne <malQRMassimilation@gmail.com> Subject: T-Mobile will soon start charging $35 activation fees for (almost) every transaction By Tyler Lee More often than not, the price for an advertised product or service isn't necessarily the only price you'll have to pay. For example, sometimes joining a gym will require you to pay a first and last month deposit, administration fees, registration fees, and so on. With carriers, there are also activation fees, a feature that T-Mobile has waived in some instances, like when you register online. Unfortunately, for customers looking to save on that fee, that may no longer be possible. According to internal documents obtained by The T-Mo Report, it appears that T-Mobile is getting ready to introduce a $35 activation fee for pretty much every transaction that you make with them. https://phandroid.com/2022/10/31/t-mobile-will-soon-start-charging-35-activation-fees-for-almost-every-transaction/ -- (Please remove QRM to reply to the "From" address)
Message-ID: <20221101133435.GA684547@telecomdigest.us> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 13:34:35 +0000 From: Bill Horne <malQRMassimilation@gmail.com> Subject: T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T find a surprise growth area in Q3 By Mike Dano Financial analysts have been preparing for a slowdown in the US wireless market for months now. However, it has not materialized, and one big reason may be the surprising number of business customers signing up for mobile services. "The business segment is actually expanding," explained analyst Roger Entner, of Recon Analytics, during his weekly podcast. He said that a wide range of corporate customers are either buying phones for their employees or are paying for their employees' personal devices. https://www.lightreading.com/5g/t-mobile-verizon-and-atandt-find-surprise-growth-area-in-q3/d/d-id/781469
Message-ID: <2KS7L.480845$wLZ8.210189@fx18.iad> Date: 31 Oct 2022 12:29:51 -0400 From: "Michael Trew" <michael.trew@att.net> Subject: Re: AT&T phone service frustration after loved one dies On 10/31/2022 10:52, Bill Horne wrote: > By Amy Davis > > AT&T seems to not have access to important records > > HOUSTON - You might remember the days when everyone had a landline or > maybe you still have one. About 75% of older Americans still have > landlines in their homes. Some are used to connecting to other > services, but other people do use the landline to make calls. A > Houston family said they don't want the phone mess they are dealing > with to happen to others, so they called KPRC 2 Investigates for help. > > https://tinyurl.com/wcmamcad I worked across the hall from an AT&T call center (Third party vendor site). A few people from AT&T moved over to Frontier when the AT&T campaign was shutting down. Throughout the mid-west, and other regions of the country, AT&T uses an archaic DOS-based system, that their billing representatives (especially the ones from the Philippines) are poorly trained on how to use. When I have to call in for my AT&T land-line, I quickly learn when an agent doesn't know what they are doing, and I make up an excuse to call back later... many of these agents are probably relieved at that. Hopefully, I get a more experienced person the next time I call. (HINT: Customer Retentions department has far more skilled agents.) Further: AT&T retail stores can only take payment on real/POTS land-lines, and they are usually sales-oriented also, and try to up-sell you on some other product (or fiber/U-verse/digital phone/mobile) while you are there. They can't/don't have access to the old system to help you change or set up a POTS land-line telephone.
Message-ID: <Dxc8L.2237$s2l3.1027@fx10.iad> Date: 1 Nov 2022 13:18:29 -0400 From: "Michael Trew" <michael.trew@att.net> Subject: Re: T-Mobile will soon start charging $35 activation fees for (almost) every transaction On 11/1/2022 9:40, Bill Horne wrote: > By Tyler Lee > > More often than not, the price for an advertised product or service > isn't necessarily the only price you'll have to pay. For example, > sometimes joining a gym will require you to pay a first and last month > deposit, administration fees, registration fees, and so on. With > carriers, there are also activation fees, a feature that T-Mobile has > waived in some instances, like when you register online. > > Unfortunately, for customers looking to save on that fee, that may no > longer be possible. According to internal documents obtained by The > T-Mo Report, it appears that T-Mobile is getting ready to introduce a > $35 activation fee for pretty much every transaction that you make > with them. > > https://phandroid.com/2022/10/31/t-mobile-will-soon-start-charging-35-activation-fees-for-almost-every-transaction/ > > -- > (Please remove QRM to reply to the "From" address) That is *not* very "un-carrier" like. I wonder if this only pertains to post-paid service, or pre-paid service, also?
Message-ID: <20221102030253.GA688439@telecomdigest.us> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 03:02:53 +0000 From: Bill Horne <malQRMassimilation@gmail.com> Subject: CALL TO ACTION! Seeking Additional Stakeholders Interested In Filing Joint Comments In FCC's RoboText Mitigation Rulemaking Proceeding; Must Act Fast! by Ronald E. Quirk, Jr. As delineated in a recent Client Advisory, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC" or "Commission") is proposing new rules to mitigate malicious robotext campaigns. The FCC is soliciting public comments on whether to require mobile wireless providers to, among other things, find and actively block illegal texts, as well as ideas to apply caller ID authentication standards to text messaging. The November 10, 2022 deadline for interested parties and stakeholders to submit comments on the proposed rules is fast approaching! https://tinyurl.com/2s4zp8zr -- (Please remove QRM to reply to the "From" address)
End of The Telecom Digest for Wed, 02 Nov 2022
Helpful Links
Telecom Digest Archives The Telecom Digest FAQ